Skip to main content

Esme and her Particular Branch of Innocence

In class, we talked a lot about what Esmé means to the narrator and why he finds her to be such a comfort. Personally, I believe that Esmé represents a break from the chaos going on around him. Right now, about to go off to war, everything is uncertain, terrifying, and real. Stumbling upon the children’s choir provided the narrator with a small haven of innocence and purity when the world around him is everything but.

It’s very important to note that the practice the narrator witnesses is a practice instead of an actual performance, and Esmé, who he focuses on, is tired and over the whole rehearsal instead of enlightened and perfectly pure. Normally we associate the beauty of children’s choirs with the beauty of the special connection they seem to have with higher beings when they sing, as well as the fact that they’re all too young to be developing issues and negativity. The fact that the narrator finds the imperfection to be the best thing about the choir shows that there’s a deeper level to the purity he’s searching. Instead of finding solace in true innocence, he finds solace in someone who is just discovering the intrigue of a messed-up world, but still too innocent and sheltered to be yet affected by the perils of the world.

This is further explored when the narrator converses with Esmé and Charles. Charles is young enough to still have that childhood innocence and cuteness, with his knock knock joke and general rambunctiousness. Most people would fixate on Charles because his whimsical- and cute-ness provides a break from the perils of the real, harsh world. But for the narrator, Esmé offers an unconventional break from his own world. She’s trying to act like an adult and isn’t super great at it, but has also been through enough that she has some understanding of real-world pain from losing her parents. The trauma that she’s been through coupled with the lack of social graces that comes with her age has enabled her to be incredibly honest and blunt about everything, especially including her father and the narrator’s job. I think that Esmé’s honesty is one of the most refreshing things about her for the narrator. I can only assume, but in the situation that he’s in, looking at going to war and not knowing if he’s going to come back breathing or in a box or even at all, everyone around him is skirting around everything negative. Nobody would want to talk to him about the war or death, but sometimes the elephant in the room can grow to be stifling. Esmé’s bluntness is refreshing and enables him to let a guard down that he’s had to keep up for god knows how long.

To wrap up, because this topic can go on for ages, Esmé provides both a knowledgeable innocence and a refreshing openness that the narrator desperately craves at this point in his life. What do you guys think about this? What are some of the other reasons that Esmé and the children’s choir is so compelling to the narrator? Why does this experience stick with him so much?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Jamie: A Product of Toxic Masculinity

In Baldwin’s “The Man Child”, Jamie presents himself as a very complex and, particularly following the ending, confusing character. He’s a bit of a brooding, mysterious type, but we learn a lot from his interaction with Eric and his fight with Eric’s father. There are many reasons and years of trouble behind Jamie murdering Eric, but I believe that the one main issue tying this whole mess together is gender roles and patriarchy. The event that started everything leading up to Eric’s death is Jamie’s wife. Jamie tries to shrug his wife leaving him off and act like he doesn’t care, but following her leaving, he very much deteriorates. He stops caring for his land, which has to be sold off, and winds up relying on Eric’s family for caretaking, becoming dependent on them as if he was their child (hence the title). There’s no way he wasn’t affected by being abandoned. In defending the idea that Jamie never actually cared for his wife, he references many of the stereotypical “wife” thin

Mr. Kapasi and Mrs. Das's Strange Dynamics

Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri has proven to be an interesting book so far, much different than the rest of the collections of short stories we’ve read in class. The stories are less heavy yet still have very complex characters, and I find them to be a breath of fresh air after we’ve been delving into so much material about child abuse, pain, and trauma. I especially enjoyed “Interpreter of Maladies”. Lahiri does an amazing job of fleshing out Mr. Kapasi’s character through subtle observations and thoughts, and the strange relationship/tension between him and Mrs. Das is fascinating to me. What I found strangest about Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi’s relationship was how fast it could change, and how drastically for two people who just met. At the start of the tour, it’s clear that Mr. Kapasi is just going through the dreary motions and as he deals with Americans all the time, nothing’s new to him. Still, I believe that he judges the Das family with more intensely than his othe

Examination of "The Kid's Guide to Divorce"

For this blog post I decided to focus on “The Kid’s Guide to Divorce”. We only had ~10 minutes to discuss it in class and although I believe there are definitely more explicatable stories in Laurie Moore’s Self-Help , this especially short story is very effective at achieving its goal and worthy of exploration. The purpose of the story is to give its readers a look into divorce and how it affects a family through the eyes of a child. However, instead of telling us directly how it feels and supporting this statement with emotional and anecdotal narrative evidence (think how Baldwin’s narrator in Paris stated plainly that Paris is much better to African Americans than America, and that he was worried about his son Paul), Moore takes a more O’Brien-esque approach. Much like how O’Brien tried to create stories that would invoke in its readers the most similar feeling to wartime experience possible, in “The Kid’s Guide to Divorce” Moore attempts to place us in a child’s position and sho