Skip to main content

Addiction in "Aurora" and Why it isn't a Love Story

In class, the main and first question posed to us was “is Aurora a love story?” Personally, my answer is a
hard no. Not because it’s an incredibly unhealthy relationship (which also plays a factor because, in my
opinion, you need to have some semblance of an actual relationship in order to have a love story), but
because that’s not what “Aurora” is about.


First and foremost, “Aurora” is Lucero’s story. It simply tells us about his life, and Aurora is simply a
part of his life. She’s the only part of his life (that we know of) that he doesn’t feel secure in. He hates
himself for always engaging with her, even when he knows he needs to drop her, which leads me to my
main point. We already know that Lucero’s love for Aurora is an addiction- we discussed it in class
and Diaz even makes a direct comparison in the text.


Addiction is everywhere in this story. Everybody is addicted to drugs, Lucero thrives financially on
addiction, and he is addicted to a girl who is toxic to him. This story is entirely about addiction.
Further than that, I believe it’s a story about how addiction is inevitable in the culture that Lucero and
Aurora has grown up in. Lucero has conquered the addiction scene, in finding a way to use it to his
advantage to make him financially stable. The vibe I got from the story was that, even though he
likes to do drugs, he’s not entirely addicted (although this is definitely debatable). His lack of
addiction shows that he has conquered addiction even further, doing so many hard drugs and having
even more pass through his hands without getting addicted himself. Despite his conquerence of drugs,
he still manages to find his own source of addiction, one that could be just as toxic as cocaine or heroin.


I think that what Diaz is trying to say is that addiction is everywhere. Not just in the form of illegal
substances but also in unhealthy relationships, and if they get toxic enough they can ruin a person
just as bad. Everyone’s addicted to something- whether it be thrill, shopping, public image, whatever.
Perhaps I’m way off the mark, but I definitely think it means something that a successful drug dealer
still finds addiction somewhere else. I believe that this is truly the theme of the story, not love or
anything.

Comments

  1. I really enjoyed reading this post, and I agree that addiction is everywhere, whether you're being consumed by it or you're profiting off of it. Lucero using the addiction scene to his advantage is something I didn't think about but definitely adds another dimension to him being good at and aware of his work.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jamie: A Product of Toxic Masculinity

In Baldwin’s “The Man Child”, Jamie presents himself as a very complex and, particularly following the ending, confusing character. He’s a bit of a brooding, mysterious type, but we learn a lot from his interaction with Eric and his fight with Eric’s father. There are many reasons and years of trouble behind Jamie murdering Eric, but I believe that the one main issue tying this whole mess together is gender roles and patriarchy. The event that started everything leading up to Eric’s death is Jamie’s wife. Jamie tries to shrug his wife leaving him off and act like he doesn’t care, but following her leaving, he very much deteriorates. He stops caring for his land, which has to be sold off, and winds up relying on Eric’s family for caretaking, becoming dependent on them as if he was their child (hence the title). There’s no way he wasn’t affected by being abandoned. In defending the idea that Jamie never actually cared for his wife, he references many of the stereotypical “wife” thin

Mr. Kapasi and Mrs. Das's Strange Dynamics

Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri has proven to be an interesting book so far, much different than the rest of the collections of short stories we’ve read in class. The stories are less heavy yet still have very complex characters, and I find them to be a breath of fresh air after we’ve been delving into so much material about child abuse, pain, and trauma. I especially enjoyed “Interpreter of Maladies”. Lahiri does an amazing job of fleshing out Mr. Kapasi’s character through subtle observations and thoughts, and the strange relationship/tension between him and Mrs. Das is fascinating to me. What I found strangest about Mrs. Das and Mr. Kapasi’s relationship was how fast it could change, and how drastically for two people who just met. At the start of the tour, it’s clear that Mr. Kapasi is just going through the dreary motions and as he deals with Americans all the time, nothing’s new to him. Still, I believe that he judges the Das family with more intensely than his othe

Examination of "The Kid's Guide to Divorce"

For this blog post I decided to focus on “The Kid’s Guide to Divorce”. We only had ~10 minutes to discuss it in class and although I believe there are definitely more explicatable stories in Laurie Moore’s Self-Help , this especially short story is very effective at achieving its goal and worthy of exploration. The purpose of the story is to give its readers a look into divorce and how it affects a family through the eyes of a child. However, instead of telling us directly how it feels and supporting this statement with emotional and anecdotal narrative evidence (think how Baldwin’s narrator in Paris stated plainly that Paris is much better to African Americans than America, and that he was worried about his son Paul), Moore takes a more O’Brien-esque approach. Much like how O’Brien tried to create stories that would invoke in its readers the most similar feeling to wartime experience possible, in “The Kid’s Guide to Divorce” Moore attempts to place us in a child’s position and sho